The image of Uzbekistan, portrayed by World media


Ушбу мақолада чет эл оммавий ахборот воситалари томонидан кейинги йигирма йил давомида Ўзбекистоннинг турли аспектларда ёритилиши тадқиқ қилинади. Узоқ муддатли шахсий кузатишлар ва олиб борилган таҳлиллар шуни кўрсатадики, Ғарб мамлакатлари журналистлари асосан бир томонлама, танқидий, МДҲ медиаси эса баъзан ижобий ва баъзан эса салбий, Осиё давлатлари матбуоти аксарият ҳолатларда ижобий мақолалар бериб келишмоқда. Яқин келажакда хорижий ОАВ томонидан мамлакат ҳақида объектив бўлмаган материаллар берилишининг давом этиши эҳтимолини инобатга олган ҳолда, тегишли давлат ташкилотлари Ғарб матбуоти томонидан тарқатилган салбий имиж ўрнига ижобий ижобий имижни ривожлантириш борасида аниқ чора-тадбирларни кўришлари керак.


В статье исследуется освещение Узбекистана в различных ракурсах зарубежными средствами массовой информации. Долгосрочные личные наблюдения и анализ показывает, что журналисты западных стран в основном освещают данную тему однобоко, критически, а медиа СНГ иногда положительно, а иногда негативно. Пресса Азии в основном подходит к данному вопросу с положительной точки зрения. Учитывая то, что зарубежные СМИ в ближайшем будущем не будут объективно освещать жизнь страны, соответствующие государственные органы должны предпринимать конкретные меры по формированию положительного имиджа страны. 


This paper examined the coverage by foreign news media of various aspects of the country of Uzbekistan for about two decades. The outcomes of the long-term personal observation and analysis revealed that the media in the West offered mainly one-sided critical stories, media in the CIS countries ran flip-flopping coverage, while those in Asian states printed somewhat positive articles. Because such coverage by foreign media appears to continue for the foreseeable future and coverage of reforms implemented by this country may not be objectively reflected by them, the Uzbek government needs to establish some measures to improve this kind of negative national image spread by the Western news media.

  1. Introduction

The author of the paper served at 3 Uzbek embassies abroad and visited 22 countries around the world (from 1996 to 2011) and worked at information agencies of the Uzbek government in the capacity of a public information officer (PIO) for almost 25 years. The experiences as a PIO, whose mission is mainly to deal with foreign journalists and to assess news coverage of Uzbekistan by their media, led the researcher to suspect that their coverage was not very favorable to Uzbekistan. In this vein, he decided to investigate coverage of Uzbekistan by foreign news media in an academic manner.

This paper purports to show that the national image of Uzbekistan has been largely portrayed negatively by the powerful Western media. This kind of negative coverage by foreign news media is sure to form negative images in the minds of foreigners and in turn, those of Uzbek nationals. Considering that we live in a globalized world interconnected with various communication technologies, unfavorable coverage of Uzbekistan by these foreign media could flow into Uzbekistan and affect Uzbeks negatively. While serving as a public information officer for over two decades, the researcher frequently faced negative coverage of Uzbekistan by foreign media such as those in the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany and other Western countries. This kind of negative coverage of this country by the Western media led the researcher to think that it is really urgent that certain measures should be taken to improve the national images portrayed by these foreign media. However, this paper first shows how serious the negative coverage by the Western media is, and raises the urgency of taking some measures to deal with this serious issue. Next paper shall deal with how to improve national image of Uzbekistan as portrayed by the Western news media.

  1. Issue Raising
  2. Independent Uzbekistan’s First President Islam Karimov once voiced his serious concerns about foreign media’s unfavorable coverage of this country. Although it may be true that powerful and global Western news media have their own independent editorial line, their constant negative coverage of this country led President Karimov to raise serious doubts about their editorial intentions in 2009. He even suspected some evil political intentions by these Western media: … it becomes clearer that behind these actions, there are evil intentions of certain political centers to exert an influence skillfully by using philosophical, ideological and informational tools to the states which are independently building their life and future, and particularly Uzbekistan. These Western media make our sons and daughters with immature worldviews go astray of their chosen path, inject into their hearts the views deemed to be totally alien and dangerous to us, and deprive us of our spiritual roots and foundations (1, 6).

Karimov may not be the only person worried about Western media’s portrayal of Uzbekistan. Many of Uzbekistan’s intellectuals share his views. The researcher’s concern over this matter also shows that Western media’s unilaterally unfavorable coverage of this country is seriously problematic.

The reasons why a country like Uzbekistan’s national image portrayed by the overwhelming Western media are important are varied. If a country is continually described negatively by the giant Western media, this country may lose respect among the people on the globe and finally lose its national prestige. The result will be loss of competitive edges in inducing foreign investment, foreign tourists, and finally losing international reputation and competitiveness.

Foreign news media’s coverage of Uzbekistan can shape positive or negative images in the hearts and minds of foreigners and Uzbeks, simultaneously. When foreign media’s reportage on Uzbekistan spreads favorable stories and photos towards Uzbekistan, it may form optimistic images in the minds of foreigners and Uzbek nationals with regard to this country and encourage them to take pride in this country. However, when foreign media’s reportage on this country spreads unfavorable and negative coverage of this country, it may form pessimistic images in the minds of foreigners and Uzbek nationals with regard to this country. It may even lead Uzbeks to lose pride in this country and to view this country with disrespect. Considering that powerful Western news media can have a strong influence over people’s imagery of a certain country, negative coverage can especially become a matter of profound concern for a national leader and its own people.

In addition, when countries like Uzbekistan make efforts to carry out reforms, negative coverage of this country can be especially damaging. What is more worrisome to countries like Uzbekistan is that there may not be effective tools to handle negative coverage conducted by these powerful Western global news media. This is especially because these media are operated by the powerful media empires based on the principles of ‘freedom of the press.’ However, to Uzbeks’ eyes, this kind of coverage appears to have been based on some political intentions, motivated by commercial purposes, or caused by simple lack of understanding of Uzbek society. Notwithstanding these outer factors that Uzbeks cannot handle, it is worthwhile to attempt an analysis of coverage of Uzbekistan by these foreign media. This analysis of the negative coverage by the Western news media over a long term could be the first steps in starting to devise ways of dealing with this nationally vital issue.

For over several decades, the world media space has been controlled by the globe’s largest Western media companies. Because of this, information on the globe has been disseminated to the world public in the shape and substance handled by owners of the Western media giants (2). In this regard, information provided by these news media may be one-sided. Michael Snyder of Economic Collapse says that “the mainstream media do not want you to look at ‘the man behind the curtain.’ They just want you to stay plugged into the “programming” that they are feeding you without asking any questions. Such circumstances may do harm not only to country’s external image, but also its domestic one. Negative news could nurture in citizens’ minds a mood of uncertainty in the future.

In comparison with the potency of Western media giants, local news media in Uzbekistan are deemed too weak to counterbalance the negative coverage of the former. In addition, one can ask a logical question such as “To what extent can the globe’s largest news disseminators observe the principle of fairness in their reportage?” What interests do these international media giants serve? At a time when the news, information and communication technologies can turn into an instrument of influencing the hearts and minds of people, it is vitally important to secure favorable coverage by these news media.

It is also right that the positive image of a country can nurture in its citizens the spirit of patriotism and national pride. It mobilizes the population to actively participate in addressing various important problems, particularly, the issues of reform and modernization, as would be required by Uzbeks. Negative coverage by foreign news media on the reforms being pursued by Uzbekistan may also affect Uzbeks’ minds negatively. 

  1. Research Questions

Considering that major foreign news media’s coverage of Uzbekistan can shape the overall national images of this country, this research tried to analyze news coverage of major countries’ media. So the research questions could be framed as follows:

  • What foreign news media portrayed Uzbekistan in the positive light and what are representative stories of positive coverage?
  • What foreign news media portrayed Uzbekistan in the negative light and what are representative stories of negative coverage?
  1. Research Methods

The first researcher of this paper, while serving as PIO for a long period, accumulated lots of news articles and routinely and regularly evaluated foreign news media’s coverage of Uzbekistan. The researcher has implemented a long-term evaluation of these foreign news articles and formed an impression of them. The research methods will be personal observation in the capacity of a PIO and evaluation over a long period of time by citing representative articles to support the researcher’s argument.

First researcher’s analysis of foreign media’s coverage of Uzbekistan has extended for over two decades and examples of positive and negative coverage were collected. But research results are mainly be centered on coverage by major foreign print media.

For this paper the first researcher has led the research and has provided basic information; and the second researcher has supplemented logic and supplied additional facts and rearranged and refined the overall paper. However, considering that negative coverage can have more powerful influence on humans than positive coverage, this paper has placed more emphasis on the negative coverage of major foreign news media and tried to show concrete representative stories, i.e., problematic coverage that portrayed Uzbekistan in the negative light. Here, the definition of positive versus negative coverage is not offered and follows just the commonsensical thinking. 

  1. Research Results
  • Overall analysis of foreign media’s coverage

The overall outcome of the long-term personal observation and evaluation of foreign news media’s coverage of Uzbekistan revealed that news media in the West – the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States – seemed to be offering largely one-sided critical and negative stories of Uzbekistan. In comparison, news media in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) – Russia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan – seemed to flip-flop in portraying Uzbekistan, sometimes negatively and sometimes positively. However, news media in Asian countries – Japan, China, South Korea, India, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt – largely published favorable articles.

Generally speaking, news stories about Uzbekistan were regularly published in the periodicals of the CIS states and countries of the East. In particular, news media in Russia, Kazakhstan, China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, India, Turkey, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates ran stories of Uzbekistan quite regularly (once or twice a month). But Uzbekistan was not regularly covered by the news media of the Western countries such as the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom. In reality, although more than twenty years have passed since the independence of the country of Uzbekistan in 1991 and the inception of reforms by this government, national efforts to improve its overseas image portrayed by the Western media have not yet been launched. Negative coverage of Uzbekistan by the Western media may be attributable to this kind of lack of efforts at the government level (First researcher of this paper has been following many of the news articles of these countries mentioned above, but here only some representative news articles of some countries have been selected to illustrate negative or positive coverage about Uzbekistan).

Why did the Western media not cover this country profusely? Paucity of Uzbek coverage by the Western media may be in part attributable to scarcity of information provided by the foreign countries to these foreign media, or to lack of foreign media’s interest in Uzbekistan. Concerning insufficient coverage on Uzbekistan by the U.S. media, provision of little information could be part of the reasons. For example, in the period from April to May 2000, the U.S. State Department initiated press meetings with local reporters from 10 states in the country, who worked for large local newspapers, magazines and television stations. Most of the American journalists who participated in the meetings admitted that they were not provided sufficient information about Uzbekistan (3). Part of the reasons may also be that public information efforts by Uzbekistan government ministries and agencies, state bodies and companies, and Uzbekistan embassies overseas haven’t been effective in dealing with foreign media. In order to have more positive coverage by the foreign media, these state organizations should have acted together in a concerted manner just as they were in an orchestra.

However, it should also be underscored that Uzbekistan’s socio-political life, specifically, elections and the processes related to them are sometimes particularly well covered by foreign news media. For instance, the world’s news media paid a large attention to the presidential elections held in March 29, 2015. This could be due to the publicity efforts made by the Information Agency “Jahon” at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, which gave a number of press conferences to publicize the presidential election. However, one-time efforts like this will not be sufficient. In the following, results of analysis into coverage on Uzbekistan by news media of respective foreign countries are exhibited.

  • Western news media: One-sided critical and negative approach

The coverage of Uzbekistan by Western news media has been generally negative. In particular, print media in some countries of the West, for example, the U.S.-based The New York Times newspaper, the German Der Spiegelmagazine and some British news media were evaluated to have been publishing mostly negative, one-sided and non-objective articles. For example, The New York Times, in its September 8, 2007 issue (4) wrote about Uzbekistan in a negative light, even while there did not exist any clear evidence to report negatively. This newspaper vaguely hinted that there may be something wrong concerning death of an Uzbek director: Mark Weil, an internationally known theater director in Uzbekistan, whose troupe, Ilkhom, caused controversy at home with its experimental productions, was fatally stabbed late Thursday night in Tashkent. He was 55. Mr. Weil died in a hospital after being attacked in front of his apartment building, a spokesman for his troupe told The Associated Press. Neighbors saw two young men waiting for him, The A.P. reported (At that time Uzbek newspapers were not clear on this issue and did not say anything about whether the death of Mark Weil was accidental or intended by others (First researcher’s search on the Internet).

The New York Times, in its September 12, 2008 issue (5) cited limited sources in a sensitive human rights issue in this country, thus reporting one-sidedly: An Uzbek journalist and human rights advocate, Solizhon Abdurakhmanov, went on trial in the city of Nukus on Friday on charges of trying to sell drugs, according to his brother, Bakhrom Abdurakhmanov. Solizhon Abdurakhmanov was arrested in June. His brother, who is representing him at the trial, said the police planted marijuana and opium on the underside of Mr. Abdurakhmanov’s car, while it was being repaired and arrested him after he picked it up. Mr. Abdurakhmanov has worked for The New York Times as a local guide and for other news organizations, including Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America, and he has provided legal aid to Uzbeks caught in the machinery of Uzbekistan’s authoritarian government” (Researcher 1 tried to look for news on this issue, but found that none of Uzbek official newspapers informed about the situation on this topic).

  1. The New York Times, in its December 17, of 2013 issue (6) criticized that Uzbekistan allows children to work in the form of forced labor in picking cotton. The New York Times correspondent Andrew E. Kramer wrote that “It is one of the world’s most bizarre systems of agricultural labor, possible, perhaps, only in one of the world’s most cloistered and repressive societies”. This story sounded quite loaded and emotional compared with other New York Times The child labor is not a common topic for local media, but the governmental news agency Jahon(Uzbek word meaning World) gave a counter-argument to this article: In 2008, Uzbekistan ratified the Convention 182 of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) concerning the Prohibition and Immediate Action for the Elimination of the Worst Forms of Child Labour and ILO Convention 138 on the minimum age for admission to employment, which are successfully implemented. In order to strengthen the responsibility of economic entities and individuals for violation of the inadmissibility of the use of child labor, as well as for violation of labor legislation in respect of persons who have not attained the age of eighteen, in 2009 adopted the Law on Amendments to the Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on administrative responsibility in connection with the improvement of the legislation on the protection of minors (7).

A German weekly news magazine Der Spiegel in its February 4, 2014 issue (8), reported that the events taking place in Ukraine could also occur in Uzbekistan. Der Spiegel correspondent writes that “too great a fear that the pictures out will cause a political crisis in these countries. Local regime with all costs trying to prevent a repeat of mass demonstrations in May 2005, as a result of the shooting of a peaceful demonstration, killing more than 500 people, and the international sanctions were introduced.”

But in this connection, one of the most powerful news agencies of the West, the Associated Press correspondent Burt Herman writes (9), that the Uzbek President Islam “Karimov has blamed Islamic militants for the unrest that began May 13, 2005 in Andijan and denies his troops fired on unarmed civilians there. He dismisses claims of rights activists who put the death toll at over 700”. AP tried to be objective by citing both sides. One can also observe various negative stories on Uzbekistan in the news outlets such as the United States’ “Voice of America,” “Liberty” and web-portal.

The British media, BBC included also very frequently portrayed Uzbekistan’s politics in the negative light. Especially, this country’s print media, being one of the major Western media, have largely portrayed Uzbekistan negatively. For example, The Guardian, in its May 16 of 2005 issue, wrote that “The British government clashed openly with Uzbekistan yesterday over the violent suppression of a protest in the former Soviet republic and that the Foreign Office said that had left hundreds dead. In an unusual condemnation of a country routinely described as a loyal ally by both Britain and the US, Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, said yesterday there had been a «clear abuse of human rights” (10). However, in an interview with Uzbek television, Dr. Shirin Akiner, a professor at the University of London who visited Andijan shortly after the massacre, supported the Uzbek government’s version of the event. Akiner said, “These people were not peaceful demonstrators, these were rebels, they were armed. On the square, there were no protests or demands from the local people, there were just some people who stood and watched what happened” (11).

In another issue, The Guardian said that “in Uzbekistan it seems that promoting condoms and sterile needles to stop the spread of HIV is «immoral» and deserving of imprisonment in its notorious jails. The country, ruled by dictator Islam Karimov – and recently lambasted by the UN Human Rights Committee – has given one of its leading AIDS workers a seven-year sentence” (12). But research on this issue showed that none of Uzbek official newspapers informed about the real situation on AIDS worker’s imprisonment (Result of researcher 1’s investigation).

Besides that, The Guardian, in its April 4 of 2015 issue, in a critical manner said that “the electoral commission reported a whopping 91.08% turnout. To no one’s surprise, the incumbent president won another five-year term, with 90.39% of the vote” (13). In contrast to the Guardian’s report, Uzbekistan National Information Agency said that “the process of voting at polling stations established at representative offices of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, India, as well as in Europe and neighbouring states continues. The elections are being held in full compliance with the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the Law on the elections of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan and other laws” (14).

However, British media very infrequently carried neutral to positive topics concerning Uzbekistan, describing this country as having a rich history and providing tourism opportunities but also suffering from ecological problems related to the Aral Sea, which has been drying up for decades. For example, the Guardian published an article entitled “Timur’s Registan: Noblest Public Square in the World” on March 31, 2015 and ran a rather positive story (15). Additionally, a British online journal Earth Times posted a story with a headline “A Future for Aral Sea is Hopefully Assured” (16). The story described today’s deplorable situation of the Aral Sea, its negative impact on the region’s environment and the poor health of its population, as well as the measures undertaken by the Uzbekistan government and the international community to address the tragedy of the Aral Sea. The London-based Russian-language news web-portal “Profile Russia” posted a news story headlined “The Representatives of the Great Britain on Uzbekistan’s Modern Development and Achievements” on February 27, 2015 (17). It is a well-known news media outlet for its fair and objective portrayal of Uzbekistan.

  • Russian news media: Flip-flopping

Russian media largely reflected the current political relations between  Moscow and Tashkent. Throughout the years it has been changing “like weather”. That means sometimes Russian media spread positive stories about Uzbekistan, and sometimes it spread negative information. For example, we can see following positive stories. News portal “” in its December 25, 2009 issue, wrote that “Uzbekistan is enjoying the fruits of democracy – the right of voting” (18). Correspondent of Infoshos said that he got a chance to see the Parliamentary elections in Uzbekistan “with his own eyes” and, accordingly, “here even a letter of election law, it is clear, cannot be broken”. Another Russian media, Information Agency “Regnum,” in its December 29, 2014 issue, said that, “Uzbekistan will direct 3.05 billion USD for a number of projects to mitigate the environmental damage caused by the shrinking of Aral Sea. Projects will be financed by loans from international financial institutions in the amount of $ 2.15 billion and own funds of the Uzbek side (19).

In contrast, sometimes Russia’s Moskowskiy Komsomоlets (Moscow’s comsomol) newspaper and KomsomolskayaPravda (Truth of comsomol) newspaper, “RIA Novosti” (Russian News Agency) and “Golos Rossii” (Voice of Russia, radio channel) spread negative stories about Uzbekistan. For instance, Moskowskiy Komsomоlets in its February 6, 2013 issue (20) said that “20 citizens of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan were detained for prostitution in Astana”. It said that «During the raid, police arrested 67 people, including a girl of easy virtue, pimps and drivers of private taxis, carrying girls. Identified 20 women in prostitution are nationals of neighboring countries such as the Republic of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan». Local media in Tashkent sometimes criticize Uzbek citizens, who work as prostitutes abroad. But this topic was not dealt with in local newspapers at that time. The same newspaper in its September 2, 2013 issue (21), informed that “a native of Uzbekistan killed a compatriot. It was established that on the night of August 21, 2013, the victim was drunk and came to the house of the suspect. The owner decided to teach the guest and gave him a few punches on the head. From the injuries the victim died on the scene. The suspect asked two of his friends, who are citizens of Uzbekistan, to help cover up the crime. The three of them put the body in two plastic bags, wrapped it with tape and moved closer to the road, leaving by the wayside.” However, this story did not appear in Uzbek newspapers.

Some stories were simply neutral. For example, Komsomolskaya Pravda wrote that “on September 29th, 2015, in Tashkent, an unknown man threw Molotov cocktails to the US embassy. In the incident, fortunately, nobody was hurt. One of the devices exploded, but no one was hurt. Security measures were strengthened, according to employees of the embassy. The embassy is now working normally. The police found out the reasons of what happened. This is not the first attack on the US embassy in Uzbekistan. In the year of 2004, for example, a bomb exploded in front of the embassy. Several people were killed and local extremists claimed responsibility.” None of Uzbek official media reported on this topic. But one of most popular Internet newspapers in Tashkent, “” distributed an article, which said that “the incident with «Molotov cocktails» could somehow be linked to the conflict between the employees of this embassy” (22).

  • Asian news media: Largely positive

Overall, news media in Asian countries such as Japan, China, and Turkey tried to carry regular coverage on Uzbekistan. Their coverage also seemed to be relatively objective. The presidential election in Uzbekistan held in March of 2015 was actively covered by the Japanese media. And other news media carried in-depth coverage of this country. The Japan-based Nippon-Evrasia newspaper (it means Japan-Europe newspaper) published a story headlined “Uzbekistan – On the Path to Consistent Democratic Development,” in which it offered a comprehensive analysis of social and political gains achieved during the years of independent progress of Uzbekistan (Result of fsrst researcher’s search online). This newspaper informed that Uzbekistan paid a special attention to holding presidential elections – the most important institution of democracy and a form of expression of people’s will. Coverage of this newspaper on Uzbekistan’s election was, on the whole, positive and to the point. The newspaper commented that effective normative and legal basis of elections was created in the country. The article said as follows: The elections in Uzbekistan were administered in pursuance with national legislation requirements and standards of international law, in the condition of openness and transparency. In general, Uzbek voters cast their ballots on an equality basis and direct and secret voting was implemented. The interference of state bodies were not allowed in the election processes.

The presidential election in Uzbekistan held in March of 2015 was also actively covered in the Chinese print media.  In particular, Jinmin Jibao(人民日報 ), one of the respected newspapers in this country and the official organ of the communist party, placed a story with the headline “Islam Karimov won more than 90 percent of the votes in the presidential election.” According to this newspaper, 90,39 percent of voters cast their ballots in favor of Islam Karimov – the candidate from the Movement of Entrepreneurs and Businessmen – Uzbekistan Liberal-Democratic Party. Jinmin Jibao also underscored that the representatives of 43 countries and nearly 300 experts from five international organizations came to Uzbekistan to monitor the presidential election as observers. Among them were representatives of national parliaments and heads of election bodies, public organizations and mass media, scholars and political scientists.

The official “Xinhua(新華)” news agency, published a story under the headline “Xi Jingpin Congratulated Islam Karimov on Election to the Post of Uzbekistan President.” The story said that on March 30 of this year the Chairman of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jingpin sent a congratulatory letter to Islam Karimov on his being elected to the post of President.

In dealing with other topics, researcher’s observations showed that the “Jinmin Jibao” newspaper and “Xinhua” news agency actively covered Uzbekistan’s domestic life and its foreign relationships. Both media outlets ran a number of news stories on the course of economic reforms in Uzbekistan, the successes achieved along the road as much as the plans for the future. The Chinese reporters presented information on Uzbekistan in a positive tone. Such news articles mainly conveyed broad facts with confirmative information. For example, stories of this newspaper offered very detailed information about a certain event, the persons participating in it, the venue and goals for holding such an event and others. In recent years, the “Jinmin Jibao” newspaper ran more than 100 stories on Uzbekistan per year and “Xinhua” news agency about 80 stories. It is expected that the amount of news stories on Uzbekistan provided by the news agency will be on the rise, considering that the “Xinhua” has set a goal to turn itself into the largest one in the world.

Discussing Chinese journalists’ active service in Uzbekistan, it seems necessary to dwell on Li Chuyfa’s many years of activity. He served as a correspondent of the economic newspaper “Jingji Shibao(經濟時報).” He mainly wrote news articles on the courses of economic and social reform in Uzbekistan. Besides, Li Chuyfa has actively covered the multifaceted cooperation ties ever developing between Uzbekistan and China. In 2012, Li Chuyfa was awarded the National Prize Oltin qalam” (Uzbek word meaning “Golden pen”) in the category of “the best news story on Uzbekistan written by foreign journalists.”  He was awarded by Journalists’ Union of Uzbekistan for improving media image of this country.

The “TRT” television, the news agency of “Cihan” and “Anadolu” of Turkey respectively were evaluated to have informed their audiences on various aspects of Uzbekistan’s life by disseminating varied information on relevant topics. Most of the news aired and printed by the Turkish media outlets can be said to be fair and true. There was no negative coverage of Uzbekistan. These news outlets paid a special attention to the information distributed by official sources, resulting in positive coverage as a result. The materials spread seem to be spreading positive information about this country.

Atif Ala, correspondent of the “Cihan” News Agency, who served for more than fifteen years in Tashkent, wrote on average around 500 stories a year. Mr. Ala participated in the immediate coverage of important political and cultural events. In particular, this correspondent not only produced news texts but also ran exclusive photos and videos on the processes of presidential elections of this country, celebrations of Navruz (an ancient New Year’s celebration held on March 21), and Independence Day celebrations (23). For many years the “TRT” television channel has been airing from Tashkent live coverage of Uzbekistan’s national holiday festivities in cooperation with Uzbekistan National Television and Radio Company. Bakhtiyor Abdukarimov, special correspondent of the Turkish “Anadolu” News Agency, is ranked among the most successful journalists, who showed excellence in his foreign journalism service. He dispatched nearly 1,000 news stories per year. In 2012, Mr. Abdukarimov was awarded the National Prize “Oltin qalam” in the category of “the best articles on Uzbekistan published in the foreign mass media (24).

On the eve of presidential elections on March 29, 2015, the “Тüкiyenin sesi (The Voice of Turkey) international radio broadcasted an air show on the topic of socio-political and socio-economic reforms in Uzbekistan, and their outcomes (25). The experts from the Center for International Strategy and Security Research of Turkey participated in the show. It is worth mentioning that the shows produced by the “Тüкiyenin sesi” international radio, which is a part of the “TRT” State Television and Radio Company, were also aired to a number of foreign countries beyond Turkey. During the broadcasting program, experts scrutinized the topic of parliamentary elections conducted in December 2014 in Uzbekistan. They emphasized that the elections were held in pursuance with standards of democracy, transparency and fairness.

  • Conclusion: Negative coverage needs be addressed

As was shown above, analysis of foreign news media’s coverage of Uzbekistan could be categorized into three groups: critical, flip-flopping (or, whimsical), and positive. The above was a summation of analysis by the researcher over a period of the past 25 years in more than 20 countries based on personal observation. The news media’s titles and selected articles are representative cases worthy of noting in this paper. To summarize the long-term analysis, it could be described as the following. The news media in the West (the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States) mostly provided one-sidedly critical stories. The media in the Commonwealth of Independent States (Russia, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan) have covered Uzbekistan in a whimsical manner.  The newspapers in major Asian countries (Japan, China and Turkey) largely ran positive stories on Uzbekistan. However, generally speaking, foreign news media did not sufficiently cover Uzbekistan’s efforts to reform itself and negative coverage by the Western media is serious.

It is anticipated that overall pattern of coverage by overseas media will continue the current situation in the foreseeable future. Considering that the coverage by local media on Uzbekistan is largely positive, it needs to be pointed out that vast differences exist in coverages between overseas news media and local news media. Indeed, the foreign reporters operating in Uzbekistan or neighboring countries, who cover Uzbekistan, play a significant role in shaping the national image on the international scene.

In this vein, it is a worthy enterprise to sharpen the methods and rules to shape better overseas images of Uzbekistan in the global public sphere, largely shaped by foreign media. This will be an urgent task for the Uzbekistan government. However, it seems that the Uzbekistan government does not pay sufficient attention to this urgent issue of improving this country’s overseas imagery. This could be cause of dissatisfaction for Uzbek people. Indeed, the gaps in coverage between foreign and local media should be addressed in a timely and effective manner. In order to do this, the Uzbekistan government needs to consider ways of expanding the scope of work with foreign correspondents in Tashkent and that of the foreign embassies operating overseas. In fact, many governments on the earth already are actively engaged in improving their national image under the name of “public diplomacy.” Uzbeks need to pay more attention to both theoretical and practical aspects of improving their country’s overseas image. The follow-up research paper by two authors will address the issue of “public diplomacy,” by which many governments on the earth try to improve their overseas national images through media and other human exchange programs.


  1. Karimov I.A. Eng asosiy mezon – hayot haqiqatini aks ettirish. – Т.: O`zbekiston, 2009. – P. 6. 24.
  2. 7 things about the mainstream media that they do not want you to know
  3. Zoghby J.C. Wedding bells for Belk? // Charlotte Business Journal, May 15, 2000, 12:00am EDT
  4. Anna Kisselgoff. Mark Weil, Tashkent Theater Director, Dies at 55. See
  5. Sabrina Tavernise. Uzbekistan: Journalist in Drug Trial.
  6. In Uzbekistan, the Practice of Forced Labor Lives On During the Cotton Harvest. ?ref=world&_r=2&gwh=260BEB1DADC28CFAD8D7E8B5874253A7&gwt=pay&, in Russian, see also Mirovalev M., Kramer E. Uzbekistan: prinuditelniy trud na hlopkovih plantatsiyah prodoljaetsa // December 18, 2013 | 17:08 | The New York Times
  7. «Round table» dedicated to the world day against child labour.
  8. Weißrussland und Usbekistan: Diktatoren fürchten Kiewer Verhältnisse.
  9. Uzbekistan’s chief rejects probe into bloody rioting.
  10. Nick Walsh. Straw condemns Uzbekistan after 500 protesters are killed.
  11. Uzbek Television and Radio Company, “Akhborot” (News), May 29, 2005
  12. Paul Canning. Uzbekistan’s Aids shame.
  13. Alec Luhn. Human rights activists’ dismay as Uzbekistan autocrat clings to power.
  14. Elections of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan: Voting Continues. See
  15. Timur’s Registan: noblest public square in the world? – a history of cities in 50 buildings, day 7.
  16. “Earth Times” Orol muammosi haqida. 07.11.2014 11:30
  17. Predstaviteli Velikobritanii o sovremennom razvitii i dostijeniyax Uzbekistana.
  18. Татьяна Синицына, главный редактор ИнфоШОС. Узбекистан вкушает плод демократии – право выбора.
  19. Узбекистан направит более $3 млрд на экологические проекты, связанные с Аральским морем.
  22. Posolstvo AShA: Otkuda rastut nogi u kokteyley Molotova?
  23. September 1, starting from 1991). (ATIF ALA. Özbekistan, bağımsızlığının 20. yıl dönümünü coşkuyla kutladı // | TAŞKENT – 01.09.2011 13:26:10 ALA. Özbekistan’a gelen turist sayısı yüzde 7 arttı // | TAŞKENT – 04.02.2011 09:45:26
  24. AA muhabirine «Altın Kalem» ödülü – aa-muhabirine – quot-altin-kalem-quot – dulu Dünyada Nevruz kutlamalari
  25. “Türkiye’nin sesi” O’zbekiston tanlagan o’z taraqqiyot yo’lining samaradorligi haqida. 23.02.2015 18:00